Apple’s 2020 iPhone 12 program has caused a major upgrade. But now, breaking news suggests that Apple’s design decisions are radical, risky and possibly excellent. Apple iPhone 12: Everything We Know So FarIn a new exclusive, ever-excellent fast company. It was revealed that Apple had decided to phase out core 5G technology from the iPhone 12 and start over. The website reports that Apple “rejected” Qualcomm’s design of the 5G antenna module because it was too big for the “fashion industry design that Apple wants the new phone to adopt.” A new report by industry figure Ming-Chi Kuo reveals disappointing news about Apple’s plans to use 5G technology in the iPhone 12. Kuo says this has been reduced to just one or two amplifiers, which means 2×2 MIMO uplink support for the end and 5G performance degradation. I suspect Apple’s gamble here is that buyers won’t notice differences in real-world scenarios, because even basic 5G implementations in smartphones can lead to significant lygouts of speed sprees over 4G. And, as sad as it seems on paper, Apple may be right. Apple faces a huge challenge to do so in just four months (the iPhone will start mass production for the first time in June). The company may have acquired Intel’s modem division last year, but Intel sold it because it had been trying to create an efficient 5G modem to compete with Qualcomm. It is no accident that Apple signed a multi-year 5G deal with Qualcomm after acquiring Intel. So this is a significant acceleration of the Apple 5G program. Beyond that, as Fast Company points out, “5G antennas are hard.” This is because 5G uses much more frequently than 4G or 3G, and is more sensitive and has less error margin. They explains: “A slight defect in the antenna on the production line may lead to connectivity problems later on. ” Apple’s previous decision to design an antenna on the iPhone 4 ended up being a fundamentally flawed (when the signal strength drops when the hand-held phone) was called the “antenna door.” It also triggered Steve Jobs’ infamous defensive response to a disgruntled iPhone 4 user: “Just avoid holding it in this way” (always misquoted as “you’ve got it wrong”). Big Rewards Apple’s big decision, on the other hand, is likely to be a huge industry-wide victory. From a business perspective, if Apple can surpass Qualcomm’s design, it could stand out from the competition and have control of another part of the iPhone – especially for Apple, given the bloody pedigree between the two companies after years of international competition. Litigation. Apple will also save money because it will reduce the portion of the phones it must license. Success also means Apple can once again develop more hardware and software, which has historically benefited it. Just as Tesla can push for updates to improve the range of its cars, because it makes its own battery and therefore knows the limits better than anyone else, Apple may push for an update that somehow improves the performance of its 5G antenna (and therefore the speed of the network). Competitors can’t buy Qualcomm antennas. From a design perspective, there has been great success. Apple’s success on a larger Qualcomm antenna means the iPhone 12 can be more stylish than any of its competitors’ 5G phones, or it can use the extra space saved to get more battery. The latter is a key consideration, given the power consumption of 5G, especially when combined with the iPhone 122’s title 120Hz display. At the same time, if the experiment fails, Apple can still resume using the Qualcomm antenna at the last minute. So this is a big step, a few years ahead of schedule. It could also be the pinnacle of the iPhone 12, which already has a new screen size, exciting remote 3D camera, possible A14 chip, and even a bargain Touch ID with Face ID in return. Disadvantages? Apple has again hinted that it will raise the price of the entire range of iPhones. That is, if there is an iPhone worth buying, then the iPhone 12’s lineup will be satisfied.
The iPhone 12 Exclusive reveals amazing Apple design decisions.
